← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case costs ordersmediation

Dunnett v Railtrack plc

[2002] EWCA Civ 303
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (England and Wales)
Year2002
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A party who unreasonably refuses to engage in ADR/mediation may face adverse costs consequences even if successful at trial.

Key Principle

costs; unreasonable refusal to mediate; adverse costs consequences; ADR encouragement

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Dunnett v Railtrack plc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Dunnett v Railtrack plc