← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case case management

Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd

(2013) 250 CLR 303
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

High Court of Australia affirmed that courts have broad powers to control proceedings and manage litigation efficiently, including in interlocutory applications.

Key Principle

interlocutory applications and case management; court's power to control proceedings efficiently

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Expense Reduction Analysts Gro...