United States litigation privilegegrounds illegality

FBI v Fazaga

595 U.S. 344 (2022)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtUS Supreme Court

Year2022

StatusBinding authority

Summary

FISA does not displace the state secrets privilege, which applies even where FISA in camera review procedures are available in national security surveillance cases.

Key Principle

FISA does not displace state secrets privilege; mosque surveillance; privilege applies even where FISA procedures available

Area of Law

evidence

Related Cases

Warden v Bailey (2020) 103 NSWLR 207

IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300

Under UEA s 97, tendency evidence in sexual offence cases requires significant probative value but no striking similarity between the tendency and charged acts.

Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588

Expert opinion evidence is admissible only if based on specialised knowledge, and the expert must identify the facts and reasoning underlying the opinion.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of FBI v Fazaga and how it applies to your situation.

Explain FBI v Fazaga