← All Authorities
Australia corporate capacity and ultra viresostensible authority

Forge v ASIC (Indoor Management)

[2006] HCA 44
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Acts of a defectively appointed director are valid under the indoor management rule (s.129 Corporations Act), protecting good faith third parties.

Key Principle

Acts done by a defectively appointed director are valid under the s.129 indoor management rule, protecting third parties dealing in good faith.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Forge v ASIC (Indoor Management) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Forge v ASIC (Indoor Managemen...