← All Authorities
Hong Kong

Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd

CACV 79/2011, Court of Appeal, judgment 2 December 2011 (reasons 29 March 2012); also reported [2012] 1 HKLRD 627 — the neutral citation '[2011] HKCA 459' should be checked against the CACV 79/2011 record.
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHong Kong Court of Appeal
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Enforcement of a Mainland Chinese arbitral award will not be refused on public policy / apparent bias grounds merely because the arbitrators also conducted mediation ('arb-med') in an unconventional manner, where there is no real evidence of bias, the party failed to raise the objection promptly (waiver), and the supervisory court at the seat had declined to set the award aside.

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415
Hyalroute Communication Group Limited v Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited [2025] HKCA 936
CNG v G & Ors [2025] HKCFI 3598

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings ...