← All Authorities
Singapore unjust enrichmentconsiderationcompromise agreements

Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter (Unjust Enrichment)

[2009] SGCA 3
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2009
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Singapore recognises unjust enrichment as an independent cause of action with four elements: enrichment, at the expense of the claimant, unjust factor, and no defence.

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

iVenture Card Ltd v Big Bus Singapore City Sightseeing Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 97
Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat [2020] SGCA 103
Quoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltd [2020] 2 SLR 20

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter (Unjust Enrichment) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Ter...