← All Authorities
United Kingdom review and reopening

Gohil v Gohil

[2015] UKSC 61
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A consent order in ancillary relief proceedings may be set aside where material non-disclosure undermined the basis on which the order was made.

Key Principle

material non-disclosure in ancillary relief; Barder events; order may be set aside where non-disclosure undermined the basis of the consent order

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

Masson v Parsons (2019) 266 CLR 554

A known sperm donor may be recognised as a legal parent under the Family Law Act 1975, overriding inconsistent State presumptions, with paramount consideration given to the best interests of the child.

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stanford v Stanford (Just and Equitable Threshold) [2012] HCA 52

A property settlement order under s.79 FLA may only be made if it is just and equitable to alter existing property interests, which must be determined as a threshold question.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gohil v Gohil and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gohil v Gohil