← All Authorities
United Kingdom

Hamilton v Al Fayed (No 2)

[2003] QB 1175
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Year2002
Statusunclear

Key Principle

Non-party costs orders require consideration of the funder’s role, control, benefit, and the fairness of shifting costs exposure.

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — non-party-costs

Related Cases

Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2004] UKPC 39; [2004] 1 WLR 2807
Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2004] 1 WLR 2807; [2004] UKPC 39
Maxamcorp International S.L. v Eurotel LLC [2026] EWHC 666

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hamilton v Al Fayed (No 2) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hamilton v Al Fayed (No 2)