← All Authorities
United Kingdom misrepresentationcollateral contractsterms

Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton

[1913] AC 30
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHouse of Lords
Year1912
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A collateral contract or warranty arises only where the parties intended the representation to have contractual force (animus contrahendi); an innocent misrepresentation, without such intent, does not found an action for damages.

Area of Law

General case law

Related Cases

Cheltenham BC v Laird [2009] EWHC 1253 (QB); [2009] IRLR 621
Cukurova Finance International Ltd v Alfa Telecom Turkey Ltd [2009] UKPC 19
Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008] UKHL 48; [2009] 1 AC 61

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Heilbut, Symons & Co v Bucklet...