← All Authorities
Australia issue estoppelestoppel

Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Hoystead v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1921) 29 CLR 537 (name corrected from 'Hoysted'); reversed on appeal in Hoystead v Commissioner of Taxation [1926] AC 155 (PC)
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year1921
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A party is precluded from re-litigating a matter that was distinctly put in issue and decided, or that was a necessary legal foundation of an earlier decision between the same parties — the doctrine Higgins J first labelled 'issue estoppel' (an aspect of res judicata / the rule in Henderson v Henderson).

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

Hopper & Anor v State of Victoria [2026] HCA 11
Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd & Ors [2026] WASC 101
City of Parramatta Council v Transport for NSW [2026] NSWSC 294

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal...