← All Authorities
Singapore

Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd

[2014] 3 SLR 329
JurisdictionSingapore
Year2014
Statusunclear

Key Principle

A nominee director owes the same fiduciary duties to the company as any other director; he or she cannot abdicate independent judgment in favour of the appointing shareholder, even where commercial bribery is alleged to be customary.

Area of Law

Company law — directors' duties — nominee directors

Related Cases

Kalen, Alexandru v World Exchange Services Pte Ltd [2026] SGHC 31
Kardachi, Jason Aleksander (private trustee of Rajesh Bothra) and another v Deepak Mishra and others [2025] SGHC 218
Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International Pte Ltd [2024] SGCA 10

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp...