← All Authorities
Singapore section 216reflective lossproper plaintiff rule

Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings Ltd

[2018] 2 SLR 333; [2018] SGCA 33
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a shareholder's grievance involves both personal wrongs and corporate wrongs, the Court of Appeal laid down an analytical framework to determine whether a s 216 oppression action is being used to circumvent the proper-plaintiff rule and the reflective-loss principle (which would otherwise require a statutory derivative action under s 216A), so that oppression and derivative actions retain distinct spheres of application.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International Pte Ltd [2024] SGCA 10
Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd [2022] SGCA(I) 5, [2022] 1 SLR 1
Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd (Minority Oppression) [2022] SGCA(I) 5

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings L...