← All Authorities
Singapore

Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings Ltd (Oppression Remedies)

[2018] SGCA 33
JurisdictionSingapore
Year2018
Statusunclear

Key Principle

A personal wrong to a shareholder (oppression) must be distinguished from a corporate wrong (breach of director's duty); only the former supports an oppression petition.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465
Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157
Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings Ltd (Oppression Remedies) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings L...