← All Authorities
United States Leading Case convention rightsseparation of powers

Hobby Lobby Stores Inc v Burwell

573 U.S. 682 (2014)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A closely held for-profit corporation may exercise religious beliefs under RFRA, and the ACA contraceptive mandate was not the least restrictive means of serving a compelling interest.

Key Principle

RFRA; closely held for-profit corporation can exercise religious beliefs; contraceptive mandate not least restrictive means

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hobby Lobby Stores Inc v Burwell and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hobby Lobby Stores Inc v Burwe...