← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case illegalitypublic authority liability

Hounga v Allen

[2014] UKSC 47
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A trafficked worker's illegal immigration status does not bar her employment discrimination claim; public policy favouring anti-trafficking obligations outweighs the illegality defence.

Key Principle

illegality defence in employment discrimination; trafficked worker's illegal immigration status does not bar discrimination claim; public policy

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hounga v Allen and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hounga v Allen