← All Authorities
Hong Kong bribes and secret commissionslimitation periods

Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo

[2024] HKCFA 32
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The CFA examined the limitation periods applicable to claims for secret profits made by a fiduciary.

Key Principle

The Court of Final Appeal examined the limitation periods applicable to claims for secret profits.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo