← All Authorities
Hong Kong forum non conveniensletters of credit

ING Bank N.V. v Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

[2024] HKCFI 2220
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court refused stay on forum non conveniens grounds in a dispute governed by URC 522, finding HK the appropriate forum.

Key Principle

Court rejected application for stay on forum non conveniens grounds in dispute under URC 522.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of ING Bank N.V. v Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain ING Bank N.V. v Industrial and...