← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case construction interpretation

Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society

[1998] 1 WLR 896
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1998
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Sets out the modern contextual approach to contractual interpretation: meaning is ascertained by reference to what a reasonable person with the relevant background knowledge would understand the language to mean.

Key Principle

modern approach to contractual interpretation; meaning ascertained from what a reasonable person with background knowledge would understand

Area of Law

Contract — Formation and Interpretation

Related Cases

MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2018] UKSC 24

A 'no oral modification' clause is legally effective, so any purported oral variation of a contract containing such a clause is unenforceable.

Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36

Commercial common sense cannot be used to override the clear and unambiguous language of a contractual term when construing its meaning.

Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co [2015] UKSC 72

Implied terms require strict business necessity or obviousness, rejecting the broader 'reasonable and equitable' Belize Telecom formulation.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Investors Compensation Scheme ...