← All Authorities
United States Leading Case trademarks

Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v VIP Products LLC

599 US 140 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

When a defendant uses a mark as a source identifier, the Rogers v Grimaldi First Amendment test does not apply and standard trademark likelihood-of-confusion analysis governs.

Key Principle

When an alleged infringer uses a mark as a source identifier for its own goods, the Rogers v Grimaldi First Amendment test does not apply; standard likelihood-of-confusion analysis governs.

Area of Law

ip

Related Cases

Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd (2014) 254 CLR 337

Foreign words used as trademarks are assessed for descriptiveness in the Australian English-speaking market; Italian words for coffee were registrable as not inherently descriptive.

Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd v Commonwealth (2012) 246 CLR 561

Statutory licence scheme for sound recordings validly enacted under constitutional copyright power and did not constitute an unjust acquisition of property.

Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (2012) 248 CLR 42

An ISP that failed to act on infringement notices did not authorise subscribers' copyright infringement via BitTorrent, as it lacked the requisite control over the infringing acts.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v VIP Products LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v...