United States likelihood of confusiondilutionrogers test

Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v VIP Products LLC

599 US 140 (2023)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year2023

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

When an alleged infringer uses a mark as a source identifier for its own goods, the Rogers v Grimaldi First Amendment test does not apply; standard likelihood-of-confusion analysis governs.

Area of Law

Related Cases

Warner Chappell Music Inc v Nealy 601 U.S. 366 (2024)

Vidal v Elster 602 U.S. 286 (2024)

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc v Goldsmith 598 U.S. 508 (2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v VIP Products LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Jack Daniel's Properties Inc v...