United Kingdom implied termsduty of careexpress and implied terms

Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA

[1992] QB 333

JurisdictionUnited Kingdom

CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Year1992

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Doctrinal subject: whether an implied term can override an express term Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333 is an English contract law case, concerning implied terms and unfair…

Area of Law

Contract and Commercial

Related Cases

Springwell Navigation Corp v JP Morgan Chase Bank [2010] EWCA Civ 1221

Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2010] EWHC 1392 (Comm)

RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Müller GmbH & Co KG [2010] UKSC 14

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA