← All Authorities
Singapore freezing injunctions mareva

JTrust Asia Pte Ltd v Group Lease Holdings Pte Ltd

[2020] SGCA 95
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal considered requirements for worldwide Mareva injunctions, including risk of asset dissipation and full and frank disclosure obligations.

Key Principle

worldwide Mareva injunction; risk of asset dissipation; full and frank disclosure obligations

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of JTrust Asia Pte Ltd v Group Lease Holdings Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain JTrust Asia Pte Ltd v Group Le...