← All Authorities
United States uncategorised

Kahler v Kansas

589 U.S. 271 (2020)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Due process does not require states to adopt the M'Naghten insanity defence; Kansas may abolish the defence in favour of a mens rea approach.

Key Principle

due process; Kansas can abolish insanity defense in favour of mens rea approach; no constitutional right to M'Naghten

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123

Appellate court must itself assess whether jury verdict was unreasonable where unchallenged opportunity evidence raised reasonable doubt as to guilt.

Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (2020) 272 CLR 177

Search warrant executed at journalist's home held invalid for technical defects; High Court considered scope of implied freedom of political communication but declined to quash the warrant on that basis.

De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57

The High Court considered the Browne v Dunn rule and the appropriate jury directions when a party fails to cross-examine a witness on a matter it intends to contradict.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Kahler v Kansas and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Kahler v Kansas