Australia

Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd

(2013) 250 CLR 392

JurisdictionAustralia

Year2013

Statusunclear

Key Principle

unconscionable conduct; problem gambling and special disadvantage; casino operator's awareness of pathological gambling not sufficient without exploitation

Area of Law

trusts

Related Cases

Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 90

Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) (2012) 200 FCR 296

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd