Singapore Leading Case uncategorized

Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd

[2005] SGCA 47; [2006] 1 SLR(R) 112

JurisdictionSingapore

CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)

Year2005

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A Mareva injunction will be discharged where the requirements for granting interlocutory asset-freezing relief, including a sufficient connection and real risk of dissipation, are not made out.

Area of Law

Related Cases

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA [2021] SGCA 14, [2021] 1 SLR 1102

Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 62; [2018] 2 SLR 1119

Obeng Comfort v Public Prosecutor [2017] 1 SLR 633; [2017] SGCA 12

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamin...