← All Authorities
Singapore strike out and summary judgment

Kim Hok Yung v Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA

[2000] SGCA 67
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2000
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Striking out under O.18 r.19 ROC is warranted only where it is plain and obvious that the pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action.

Key Principle

striking out under O.18 r.19 ROC; plain and obvious case; no reasonable cause of action

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Kim Hok Yung v Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Kim Hok Yung v Cooperative Cen...