← All Authorities
Australia controlled actionprecautionary principlejudicial review

Lansen v Minister for Environment and Heritage

Lansen v Minister for Environment and Heritage (2008) 174 FCR 14; [2008] FCAFC 189
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFull Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

On judicial review of a controlled-action approval under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), the precautionary principle operates not as a free-standing mandatory relevant consideration but as a principle informing the manner in which environmental impacts are assessed and weighed, and an assessment report and approval are not invalidated merely because data on some impacts is incomplete.

Area of Law

environmental

Related Cases

Sharma v Minister for the Environment Minister for the Environment v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92
Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning (Rocky Hill Mine) [2019] NSWLEC 7

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lansen v Minister for Environment and Heritage and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lansen v Minister for Environm...