← All Authorities
Hong Kong Leading Case familynuptial agreementsprenuptial agreementsweight and fairness of nuptial agreements

LCYP v JEK

[2019] HKCFI 1588
JurisdictionHong Kong
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Applying Radmacher in Hong Kong, the court should give effect to a nuptial agreement freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to it. A pre-nuptial agreement executed abroad after negotiation, with separate independent legal advice and full financial disclosure, was nonetheless held unfair where the parties' circumstances had changed materially during the marriage — the wife having given up her career to raise the children while the husband's business flourished — and the court made an award sufficient to maintain the wife for life notwithstanding the agreement.

Area of Law

Family Law — prenuptial-agreements

Related Cases

Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Ltd v Samantha Jane Bradley [2026] HKCFA 2
Xue Boran & Yang Lixuan v Hui Chi Sum & Yuen Sze Man [2026] HKCA 247
Re USUM Investment Group Ltd [2026] HKCFI 1320

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of LCYP v JEK and how it applies to your situation.

Explain LCYP v JEK