← All Authorities
Singapore entitlementspenalty clausesdiscretion

Leiman, Ricardo v Noble Resources Ltd

[2020] 2 SLR 386; [2020] SGCA 52
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a settlement agreement governing post-resignation entitlements vests decision-making power in a contractually designated entity (such as a Remuneration Committee), courts will review whether the entity acted within the scope of its powers, followed implied procedural requirements, and assessed only conduct falling within the agreement's temporal scope; a clause that forfeits vested benefits as a secondary consequence of breach may be struck down as a penalty.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012] SGCA 39; [2012] 4 SLR 308
Singapore Airlines Ltd v Tan Shwu Leng [2001] 3 SLR(R) 439
Kalen, Alexandru v World Exchange Services Pte Ltd [2026] SGHC 31

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Leiman, Ricardo v Noble Resources Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Leiman, Ricardo v Noble Resour...