← All Authorities
United States Leading Case patents

Lexmark International Inc v Impression Products Inc

581 US 360 (2017)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A patentee's authorised sale exhausts all patent rights in the item sold; post-sale restrictions cannot give rise to patent infringement claims under the exhaustion doctrine.

Key Principle

A patentee's decision to sell a product exhausts all patent rights in that item; post-sale restrictions do not give rise to patent infringement claims (patent exhaustion).

Area of Law

ip

Related Cases

Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd (2014) 254 CLR 337

Foreign words used as trademarks are assessed for descriptiveness in the Australian English-speaking market; Italian words for coffee were registrable as not inherently descriptive.

Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd v Commonwealth (2012) 246 CLR 561

Statutory licence scheme for sound recordings validly enacted under constitutional copyright power and did not constitute an unjust acquisition of property.

Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (2012) 248 CLR 42

An ISP that failed to act on infringement notices did not authorise subscribers' copyright infringement via BitTorrent, as it lacked the requisite control over the infringing acts.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lexmark International Inc v Impression Products Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lexmark International Inc v Im...