← All Authorities
Hong Kong vicarious liabilityagency duties and liabilities

Li Yau Wai v Genesis Capital Securities Ltd

(2003) 6 HKCFAR 1
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A securities firm is vicariously liable for its agent's fraudulent acts committed within the scope of the agent's authority in dealing with clients.

Key Principle

vicarious liability of principal for agent's fraud in securities dealing

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560

On termination of a building contract, a builder may recover reasonable value of work done in restitution, subject to the contract price as a ceiling where work was performed under a valid contract.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Bank late payment fees are not penalties where they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss or protect a legitimate interest of the stipulating party.

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

High Court of Australia examined the principles governing rectification of written contracts for common intention and unilateral mistake in equity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Li Yau Wai v Genesis Capital Securities Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Li Yau Wai v Genesis Capital S...