← All Authorities
Australia mediationthird party fundingjudgment

Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd

(2014) 313 ALR 383
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtSupreme Court of Victoria
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court approved $494M Black Saturday bushfire class action settlement under Part IVA, addressing litigation funding arrangements and settlement approval principles.

Key Principle

Bushfire class action; Black Saturday; Part IVA proceedings; settlement approval; litigation funding arrangement; $494M settlement

Area of Law

class-action

Related Cases

Allphones Retail Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2009) 253 ALR 324

Federal Court held representative proceedings under Part IVA permissible in franchise network class action where common issues predominated and claims arose from same or related circumstances.

Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd v Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd [2006] SGCA 7

Representative proceedings under O.15 r.12 require claimants to share the same interest; Singapore's limited class action mechanism applied in a construction industry dispute.

Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca [1997] 1 SLR 401

The 'same interest' requirement for representative actions is strictly construed, and minority shareholder claims must be distinguished between derivative and representative proceedings.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty...