← All Authorities
United States us whitebook bridge

Mayle v. Felix

545 U.S. 644 (2005)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Summary

“Conduct, transaction, or occurrence” construed in habeas amendments — often cited by analogy (use carefully in ordinary civil cases)

Key Principle

“Conduct, transaction, or occurrence” construed in habeas amendments — often cited by analogy (use carefully in ordinary civil cases)

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — FRCP 15 amendments

Related Cases

Krupski v. Costa Crociere S. p. A. 560 U.S. 538 (2010)

Rule 15(c)(1)(C) “mistake” inquiry focuses on what the prospective defendant knew or should have known, not on the plaintiff’s diligence

Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc. 529 U.S. 460 (2000)

Due-process limits on adding a party and imposing judgment without opportunity to respond — amendment and party-addition caution

Schiavone v. Fortune 477 U.S. 21 (1986)

Pre-amendment relation-back timing themes for party changes; historical backdrop to modern 15(c)/4(m) structure

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Mayle v. Felix and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Mayle v. Felix