← All Authorities
Australia grounds illegalityparliamentary sovereignty

Minister for the Environment v Queensland Conservation Council Inc

[2004] FCAFC 190
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFull Federal Court of Australia
Year2004
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Full Federal Court interpreted 'action' and 'significant impact' under the EPBC Act in the context of the Nathan Dam and nuclear actions provisions.

Key Principle

EPBC Act; nuclear actions; Nathan Dam; meaning of 'action' and 'significant impact' on matters of national environmental significance

Area of Law

environmental

Related Cases

Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2022] FCAFC 35

Full Federal Court overturned trial judge and held no novel duty of care is owed by the Environment Minister to Australian children when approving fossil fuel projects under climate change concerns.

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92

NSW Land and Environment Court held the EPA had a statutory duty under the POEO Act to develop environmental protection policies addressing climate change, enforceable by judicial review.

Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning (Rocky Hill Mine) [2019] NSWLEC 7

First Australian court decision refusing mine approval on climate change grounds, holding that a project's greenhouse gas contributions are a material consideration in planning decisions.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Minister for the Environment v Queensland Conservation Council Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Minister for the Environment v...