← All Authorities
United States Leading Case liquidation voluntary and compulsory

MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v Transform Holdco LLC

598 U.S. 288 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code's mootness provision for asset sales is not jurisdictional, so appellate courts retain discretion over its application.

Key Principle

bankruptcy; s 363(m) mootness provision for asset sales is not jurisdictional; appealability preserved

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v Transform Holdco LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v Trans...