← All Authorities
United States editorial discretioncontent moderationfacial challenge

Moody v Netchoice LLC

603 U.S. 707 (2024)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A social-media platform's curation and moderation of the content it displays is expressive activity protected by the First Amendment, and a State may not compel a platform to carry or alter that content to advance the State's own vision of balanced discourse; lower courts must analyze facial First Amendment challenges to such laws across the full range of the statutes' applications.

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

Trump v Anderson Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024)
Rahimi v United States United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024) (No. 22-915)
United States v Rahimi (DV Firearms) 602 U.S. 680 (2024)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Moody v Netchoice LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Moody v Netchoice LLC