United States arbitrary and capricious reviewreasoned decisionmakingrulemaking

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v State Farm Mutual

463 U.S. 29 (1983)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year1983

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

An agency must provide a reasoned explanation for rescinding a rule; the arbitrary and capricious standard requires consideration of relevant factors and a rational connection between facts and the decision.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo 603 U.S. ___ (2024)

SEC v Jarkesy No. 22-859 (2024)

Corner Post Inc v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 144 S. Ct. 2440 (2024)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v State Farm Mutual and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Motor Vehicle Manufacturers As...