← All Authorities
Singapore drug offencesequal protectionprosecutorial discretion

Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General

Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 53, [2015] 5 SLR 1222
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The Public Prosecutor's determination under s 33B(2)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act whether an accused has rendered substantive assistance to the CNB is reviewable only on the limited grounds of bad faith, malice or unconstitutionality (per s 33B(4)); mere disparity in outcome between co-offenders does not, without more, establish a prima facie breach of Article 12 of the Constitution.

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Tangaraju s/o Suppiah v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGCA 8
Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General [2022] SGCA 26
Public Prosecutor v Azlin bte Arujunah and other appeals [2022] SGCA 52

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali ...