← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case pure economic lossduty of care

Murphy v Brentwood District Council

[1991] 1 AC 398
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1991
StatusBinding authority

Summary

No duty of care in negligence for pure economic loss caused by defective buildings; expressly overruled Anns v Merton LBC.

Key Principle

no duty of care for pure economic loss from defective buildings; overruled Anns

Area of Law

Tort — Duty of Care

Related Cases

Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4

Established duty of care categories apply directly; Caparo three-stage test is reserved for genuinely novel situations only.

Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145

A professional who assumes responsibility for another's affairs owes a Hedley Byrne duty of care in tort for pure economic loss, concurrent with any contractual duty.

Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605

Three-stage test for novel duty of care requires foreseeability of harm, proximity between parties, and that imposition of duty be fair, just and reasonable.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Murphy v Brentwood District Council and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Murphy v Brentwood District Co...