← All Authorities
United States Leading Case constitutional

Murr v Wisconsin

582 U.S. 383 (2017)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Regulatory takings analysis requires a multi-factor test to identify the relevant parcel, considering physical, legal, and economic characteristics of the property.

Key Principle

regulatory takings; relevant parcel analysis; multiple factors for identifying property unit

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Murr v Wisconsin and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Murr v Wisconsin