United States removalnotice to appearstatutory interpretation

Niz-Chavez v Garland

593 US 155 (2021)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year2021

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A notice to appear that omits the time and date of a removal hearing does not trigger the stop-time rule for cancellation of removal; the statute requires a single document containing all required information (Justice Gorsuch).

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS v United States 598 US 264 (2023)

Dupree v Younger 598 U.S. 729 (2023)

Yegiazaryan v Smagin 599 U.S. 533 (2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Niz-Chavez v Garland and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Niz-Chavez v Garland