← All Authorities
United States public authority dutiesseparation of powers

O'Connor-Ratcliff v Garnier

601 U.S. 205 (2024)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A public official's social media activity constitutes state action under the First Amendment when the official purports to exercise governmental authority in operating the account.

Key Principle

First Amendment; school board member blocking constituents on social media; state action analysis

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of O'Connor-Ratcliff v Garnier and how it applies to your situation.

Explain O'Connor-Ratcliff v Garnier