← All Authorities
United States us whitebook bridge

Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.

484 U.S. 97 (1987)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1987
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Absent a statutory basis, federal court needs effective service authorization; personal jurisdiction and service are linked

Key Principle

Absent a statutory basis, federal court needs effective service authorization; personal jurisdiction and service are linked

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — FRCP 3 4 5 commencement and service

Related Cases

Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon 581 U.S. 271 (2017)

Hague Service Convention does not prohibit service by postal channels where the receiving state has not objected

Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc. 526 U.S. 344 (1999)

Removal defendant’s time to remove runs from formal service of process (or waiver/equivalent), not mere receipt of the complaint

Henderson v. United States 517 U.S. 654 (1996)

Rule 4’s period for service controls service timing in the statutory setting at issue; Rules Enabling Act framework for service

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co. and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Omni Capital International, Lt...