← All Authorities
Hong Kong arbitration agreements

Pacific International Lines (Pte) Ltd v Tsinlien Metals and Minerals Co Ltd

(1993) 2 HKLR 249
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Appeal
Year1993
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court must grant mandatory stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration where a valid arbitration agreement exists under the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance.

Key Principle

stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration; mandatory stay under Arbitration Ordinance

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514

A dispute must be referred to arbitration if it falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, applying a generous interpretation in favour of arbitrability.

TCL Air Conditioner v Judges of the Federal Court (Arbitral Awards) [2013] HCA 5

Enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards does not involve arbitrators exercising judicial power; enforcement itself is a judicial function constitutionally vested in Chapter III courts.

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415

Court considered how the Guy Lam discretion operates where the existence of an arbitration agreement is itself in dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pacific International Lines (Pte) Ltd v Tsinlien Metals and Minerals Co Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pacific International Lines (P...