← All Authorities
Singapore just and equitable winding up

Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v SY Technology Inc

[2008] 2 SLR(R) 491
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A company may be wound up on just and equitable grounds where a quasi-partnership exists and mutual confidence between members has broken down, applying Ebrahimi principles.

Key Principle

winding up; just and equitable ground; quasi-partnership; loss of mutual confidence; Ebrahimi principles

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v SY Technology Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v S...