← All Authorities
United States Leading Case constitutional

Palazzolo v Rhode Island

533 U.S. 606 (2001)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Acquisition of property after a regulation was enacted does not automatically bar a subsequent regulatory takings claim under the Fifth Amendment.

Key Principle

regulatory takings; acquisition of property after regulation enacted does not bar takings claim

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Palazzolo v Rhode Island and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Palazzolo v Rhode Island