← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case deceit

Panatron Pte Ltd v Lee Cheow Lee

[2001] 2 SLR(R) 435
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Leading Singapore authority establishing the elements of the tort of deceit (fraudulent misrepresentation) required for liability.

Key Principle

fraudulent misrepresentation; the leading Singapore authority on the tort of deceit

Area of Law

Tort and Negligence

Related Cases

Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 215 CLR 1

Costs of raising a healthy child born following negligent sterilisation advice are recoverable as damages in a wrongful birth claim.

Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562

HCA held that a general neighbourhood principle cannot determine duty of care; coherence of the law acts as a constraining factor in novel duty situations.

Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180

High Court of Australia established a multi-factor approach to pure economic loss, considering vulnerability, assumption of responsibility, and control in determining duty of care.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Panatron Pte Ltd v Lee Cheow Lee and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Panatron Pte Ltd v Lee Cheow L...