← All Authorities
Singapore duty to promote success s172misfeasanceno profit rule

Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Liu Cheng Chan

[2017] SGHC 15
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Directors who caused an insolvent company to pay dividends breached their fiduciary duties and were jointly and severally liable to restore the funds to the company.

Key Principle

The SGHC held that directors who caused the company to pay dividends when the company was insolvent breached their fiduciary duties; the directors were jointly and severally liable to restore the funds to the company.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Liu Cheng Chan and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Liu...