← All Authorities
Singapore compensationprosecutorial discretionaccess to justice

Parti Liyani v PP

[2021] 3 SLR 1088
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court of Singapore
Year2021
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

On an acquitted accused's application for compensation under s 359(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, a prosecution is 'frivolous or vexatious' where it was purposeless, lacking in seriousness, or otherwise an improper exercise of prosecutorial power having regard to the Prosecution's duties as ministers of justice; the application here was dismissed because an objective prosecutor could have considered the case fit to be tried.

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Tangaraju s/o Suppiah v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGCA 8
Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General [2022] SGCA 26
Public Prosecutor v Azlin bte Arujunah and other appeals [2022] SGCA 52

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Parti Liyani v PP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Parti Liyani v PP