← All Authorities
Singapore schemes of arrangement insolvency

Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP v Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Scheme)

[2019] SGCA 29
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A scheme of arrangement must be proposed in good faith and creditors with sufficiently different rights must vote in separate, properly constituted classes.

Key Principle

A scheme of arrangement must be proposed in good faith and the classes must be properly constituted; creditors whose rights differ sufficiently must vote in separate classes.

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP v Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd (Scheme) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP...