← All Authorities
Hong Kong

Peconic Industrial Development Ltd v Lau Kwok Fai

[2009] HKCFA 1; (2009) 12 HKCFAR 139, Court of Final Appeal, 27 February 2009 — NOTE: the corpus neutral citation '[2009] HKCFA 16', court 'Court of First Instance' and the existing_principle (unfair prejudice / quasi-partnership exclusion) are all wrong; this is a CFA limitation-of-actions decision on dishonest assistance/knowing receipt.
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHong Kong Court of Final Appeal
Year2009
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

For limitation purposes a distinction must be drawn between two classes of constructive trustee, and a dishonest assister (and a knowing recipient who has not assumed a prior fiduciary obligation) falls within the second class to whom the statutory exclusion from limitation does not apply, so that such a claim is subject to the ordinary six-year limitation period.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Chin Choon Onn and Jong Yai Kit v Lai Sum Hung & Ors [2026] HKCA 149
Re Goldstone Holdings Limited [2025] HKCFI 2778
Shown Wai Investment Company Limited v Hui Yip Wing David [2024] HKCFI 1477

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Peconic Industrial Development Ltd v Lau Kwok Fai and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Peconic Industrial Development...